Understanding when one agent represents both buyer and seller
Last Updated: January 2026
When buying or selling a home, you expect your real estate agent to represent your best interests. But what happens when the same agent-or the same brokerage-represents both the buyer and the seller in a single transaction? This arrangement is called dual agency, and it's one of the most controversial practices in the real estate industry.
Understanding what you need to know about dual agency is essential for anyone entering the real estate market. When there's only one agent handling both sides of a transaction-acting as both the seller's agent and the buyer's agent-the dynamics change dramatically. In this comprehensive guide, we'll explain what "dual agency" means in states where it's legal, how it works, the potential risks and benefits, and how to protect yourself whether you're buying or selling a home.
Dual agency occurs when a single real estate agent represents both the buyer and the seller in the same real estate transaction. In this agency relationship, one agent may represent both parties instead of having separate agents advocate for each party's interests. A dual agent may facilitate the entire deal while acting as a dual agent for the seller and buyer simultaneously.
There are two main forms of dual agency:
In a typical real estate transaction, the listing agent works exclusively for the seller, while the buyer's agent represents the home buyer's interests. Each agent has a fiduciary duty to their respective client, meaning they must negotiate the best possible terms for their side. When a real estate agent represents both parties, this agency relationship fundamentally changes-a scenario the National Association of REALTORS® has specific guidelines about.
When a real estate agent's client decides to work with them on both sides of a transaction, they may represent both the buyer and the seller. A dual agency situation typically arises when:
When dual agency occurs, the agent must inform both the buyer and seller in a transaction and obtain written consent before proceeding. The law of agency requires the agent to act fairly toward both sides. The agent then transitions from being an advocate for one party to being a neutral facilitator for both. This means the dual agent cannot:
In a dual agency arrangement, the agent's role shifts from advocate to facilitator. They can provide factual information and help with paperwork, but cannot offer strategic advice that benefits one party over the other.
Dual agency legality varies significantly by state-understanding where it's legal is crucial for any home buyer or seller. In states where it's legal, dual agency requires proper disclosure and consent. As of 2026, here's how states handle dual agency:
| Status | States |
|---|---|
| Dual Agency Prohibited | Alaska, Colorado, Florida, Kansas, Maryland, Oklahoma, Texas, Vermont, Wyoming |
| Allowed with Disclosure | California, New York, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Ohio, Michigan, Georgia, North Carolina, and most other states |
| Designated Agency Allowed | Most states permit designated agency, where different agents from the same brokerage can represent opposing parties |
Several states have banned dual agency entirely due to the inherent conflict of interest. In states where it's illegal, consumers must work with another agent if they want representation-they cannot agree to dual agency arrangements even if they wanted to. Understanding the different types of agency relationships helps you know what to expect.
In states where dual agency is prohibited, agents typically operate as transaction brokers or facilitators who help both parties complete the transaction without representing either side exclusively.
Whether dual agency benefits or harms buyers and sellers depends on the specific situation. When the seller's agent and the buyer's agent are the same person, or when there's only one agent handling both sides, here are the potential advantages and disadvantages:
Consumer advocacy groups, including the Consumer Federation of America, recommend against dual agency because the inherent conflict of interest makes it nearly impossible for one agent to serve both parties fairly. The seller wants the highest price; the buyer wants the lowest-these goals are fundamentally opposed.
Many real estate brokerages use designated agency (also called assigned agency) as an alternative to traditional dual agency. Understanding how agents work within these different types of agency structures helps you make informed decisions. When dual agency arises, here's how it differs from designated agency:
| Aspect | Dual Agency | Designated Agency |
|---|---|---|
| Agent representation | Same agent represents both parties | Different agents from same brokerage represent each party |
| Fiduciary duty | Limited for both parties | Each agent maintains duty to their client |
| Negotiation assistance | Cannot advise either party | Each agent can advise their client |
| Confidentiality | Agent knows all information | Agents maintain client confidentiality (brokerage-level dual agency still exists) |
While designated agency offers better protection than agents acting as dual agents in single-agent situations, it's not perfect. The supervising broker still has access to information from both sides, and the seller's agent and the buyer's agent at the same office may share information inadvertently. When the same person serves as the agent and the buyer's agent simultaneously, conflicts are inherent.
If you find yourself in a potential dual agency situation in states where it's legal, here's how to protect your interests as a buyer's agent or seller's agent client:
The best way to protect yourself is to have dedicated representation from the start.
Find My Agent →In states where dual agency is permitted, agents must provide written disclosure as part of dual agency agreements and obtain consent from both parties. This agency may only proceed with proper documentation. The disclosure typically includes:
This disclosure must happen before substantive negotiations begin-not after an offer has been made. If an agent fails to disclose dual agency properly, the transaction may be voidable, and the agent could face disciplinary action.
When reviewing a dual agency disclosure, pay attention to:
While we generally advise against dual agency, there are limited situations where a dual agency transaction may be acceptable. In states where dual agency is allowed, here are scenarios where it might work:
Even in these situations, consider having a real estate attorney review documents and advise on terms.
Before entering any real estate transaction, ask your agent these questions:
A good agent will answer these questions honestly and respect your preference to avoid dual agency if that's your choice.
Several factors are shaping the future of dual agency in real estate:
Many real estate professionals believe dual agency will become less common as consumers demand better representation and states implement stricter regulations.
Dual agency occurs when one real estate agent's brokerage represents both the buyer and seller in the same transaction. In a "dual agency" arrangement, the agent becomes a neutral facilitator rather than an advocate for either party, which creates an inherent conflict of interest. There's only one agent involved rather than a separate buyer's agent and seller's agent.
Dual agency is generally disadvantageous for buyers because the agent cannot help negotiate the lowest price or advocate for buyer-favorable terms. The buyer loses the benefit of having someone in their corner during what is often the largest purchase of their life.
Dual agency can also harm sellers. While the listing agent already knows the property, they cannot advise the seller on whether to accept an offer or how to negotiate better terms. Some studies suggest dual agency properties sell for slightly less than those with separate representation.
Yes, you can refuse "dual agency" arrangements. If a dual agency situation arises, you have the right to seek separate representation from another real estate agent's brokerage. In most states, you must give written consent for dual agency to proceed, so simply decline to sign the consent form and request your own agent and the buyer's agent to be different people.
As of 2026, Alaska, Colorado, Florida, Kansas, Maryland, Oklahoma, Texas, Vermont, and Wyoming have banned or significantly restricted dual agency. Check your state's specific laws, as regulations vary and may change.
In dual agency, one agent represents both parties. In designated agency, two different agents from the same brokerage represent the buyer and seller separately. Designated agency provides better client representation, though the brokerage still has access to information from both sides.
In a dual agency situation, the agent (or their brokerage) typically keeps the entire commission rather than splitting it with a cooperating agent. This creates a financial incentive to encourage dual agency, which is why some critics argue the practice primarily benefits agents rather than clients.
Dual agency is a controversial practice that significantly limits the representation you receive as a buyer or seller. While it's legal in most states with proper disclosure, the inherent conflict of interest means neither party gets a true advocate.
Key takeaways:
For most buyers and sellers, the safest approach is to work with an agent who represents only your interests. The small potential benefits of dual agency rarely outweigh the loss of dedicated advocacy during one of life's most significant financial transactions.
Skip the dual agency dilemma-get matched with an agent who works exclusively for you.
Find My Agent →